Adverbs - Revision history

imported>Danielsaeger at 18:44, 20 April 2014

2014-04-20T18:44:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:44, 20 April 2014
Line 7:		Line 7:
	*'''Adjunct adverbs''' (AAV) (such as “slowly”, “always”, “frequently”, “here”, etc) are adverbs that qualify a verb, an adjective or another adverb by indicating manner, time, place and frequency. They answer questions such as "how", "when", "where" and "how often". They differ from specifier adverbs in the sense they introduce and can be associated to independent concepts;		*'''Adjunct adverbs''' (AAV) (such as “slowly”, “always”, “frequently”, “here”, etc) are adverbs that qualify a verb, an adjective or another adverb by indicating manner, time, place and frequency. They answer questions such as "how", "when", "where" and "how often". They differ from specifier adverbs in the sense they introduce and can be associated to independent concepts;
	*'''Conjuncts''' (CJT) <ref>Not to be confounded with conjunctions</ref> (such as "in addition", "in other words", "for instance", etc) are connecting adverbs that add information to the sentence that is not considered part of the propositional content (or at least not essential) but which connects the sentence with previous parts of the discourse; and		*'''Conjuncts''' (CJT) <ref>Not to be confounded with conjunctions</ref> (such as "in addition", "in other words", "for instance", etc) are connecting adverbs that add information to the sentence that is not considered part of the propositional content (or at least not essential) but which connects the sentence with previous parts of the discourse; and
	*'''Disjuncts''' (DJT) (aka as adverbs of viewpoint or commenting adverbs, such as "fortunately", "in my opinion", etc) express information that is not considered essential to the sentence it appears in, but which is considered to be the speaker's or writer's attitude towards, or descriptive statement of, the propositional content of the sentence.		*'''Disjuncts''' (DJT) (aka adverbs of viewpoint or commenting adverbs, such as "fortunately", "in my opinion", etc) express information that is not considered essential to the sentence it appears in, but which is considered to be the speaker's or writer's attitude towards, or descriptive statement of, the propositional content of the sentence.

	== UNL ==		== UNL ==

imported>Martins at 19:09, 14 December 2010

2010-12-14T19:09:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:09, 14 December 2010
Line 71:		Line 71:
	\|}		\|}
	*'''Disjuncts''' are represented as follows:		*'''Disjuncts''' are represented as follows:
	**As attributes, if their meaning can be subsumed by any of the [[modality\|attributes of modality]] (such as ~~@emphasis,~~ @belief, @conviction, etc); or		**As attributes, if their meaning can be subsumed by any of the [[modality\|attributes of modality]] (such as @belief, @conviction, etc); or
	**As UWs, otherwise.		**As UWs, otherwise.
	{\|table border=1 align=center cellpadding=2		{\|table border=1 align=center cellpadding=2

imported>Martins at 09:45, 8 May 2010

2010-05-08T09:45:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:45, 8 May 2010
Line 58:		Line 58:
	\|align=center\|man(do, usually)		\|align=center\|man(do, usually)
	\|}		\|}
	*'''Conjuncts''' are ~~to be~~ represented as UWs linked to the whole sentence (to be treated as a hypernode) by the relation man (manner).		*'''Conjuncts''' are represented as UWs linked to the whole sentence (to be treated as a hypernode) by the relation man (manner).
	{\|table border=1 align=center cellpadding=2		{\|table border=1 align=center cellpadding=2
	\|+Conjuncts		\|+Conjuncts
Line 70:		Line 70:
	\|man("music is appreciated in France", "in other words")		\|man("music is appreciated in France", "in other words")
	\|}		\|}
	*'''Disjuncts''' are ~~to be~~ represented as follows:		*'''Disjuncts''' are represented as follows:
	**As attributes, if their meaning can be subsumed by any of the [[modality\|attributes of modality]] (such as @emphasis, @belief, @conviction, etc); or		**As attributes, if their meaning can be subsumed by any of the [[modality\|attributes of modality]] (such as @emphasis, @belief, @conviction, etc); or
	**As UWs, otherwise.		**As UWs, otherwise.
Line 87:		Line 87:

	;Observation		;Observation
	:Not all intensifiers are ~~to be~~ represented as attributes. Many adjunct adverbs (such as ''amazingly'', ''absurdly'', ''sharply'', ''terribly'', ''deeply'', ''unbelievably'', etc) may also be used to amplify adjectives. However, as they are not only intensifiers but also qualifiers, they must be represented as UWs:		:Not all intensifiers are represented as attributes. Many adjunct adverbs (such as ''amazingly'', ''absurdly'', ''sharply'', ''terribly'', ''deeply'', ''unbelievably'', etc) may also be used to amplify adjectives. However, as they are not only intensifiers but also qualifiers, they must be represented as UWs:
	{\|table border=1 align=center cellpadding=2		{\|table border=1 align=center cellpadding=2
	\|+Intensifiers		\|+Intensifiers

imported>Martins at 09:44, 8 May 2010

2010-05-08T09:44:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:44, 8 May 2010
Line 10:		Line 10:

	== UNL ==		== UNL ==
	In UNL, adverbs are ~~to be~~ represented as UWs or attributes, depending on the case:		In UNL, adverbs are represented as UWs or attributes, depending on the case:
	*'''Specifier adverbs''' are represented by [[degree\|attributes of degree]] (@not, @more, @less, @plus, @minus, @almost, @again, etc);		*'''Specifier adverbs''' are represented by [[degree\|attributes of degree]] (@not, @more, @less, @plus, @minus, @almost, @again, etc);
	{\|table border=1 align=center cellpadding=2		{\|table border=1 align=center cellpadding=2
Line 108:		Line 108:
	\|align=center\|man(difficult, relatively)		\|align=center\|man(difficult, relatively)
	\|}		\|}


	== Notes ==		== Notes ==
	<references />		<references />

imported>Martins at 11:47, 27 March 2010

2010-03-27T11:47:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:47, 27 March 2010
Line 6:		Line 6:
	*'''Specifier adverbs''' (SAV) (such as “not”, “more”, “less”, “very”, etc) are adverbs that do not really introduce new information, but only specify the information conveyed by a verb, an adjective or another adverb. They do not constitute properly an open class category and many of them may be replaced by other closed class categories, such as affixes (not happy = unhappy, write again = rewrite, more happy = happier);		*'''Specifier adverbs''' (SAV) (such as “not”, “more”, “less”, “very”, etc) are adverbs that do not really introduce new information, but only specify the information conveyed by a verb, an adjective or another adverb. They do not constitute properly an open class category and many of them may be replaced by other closed class categories, such as affixes (not happy = unhappy, write again = rewrite, more happy = happier);
	*'''Adjunct adverbs''' (AAV) (such as “slowly”, “always”, “frequently”, “here”, etc) are adverbs that qualify a verb, an adjective or another adverb by indicating manner, time, place and frequency. They answer questions such as "how", "when", "where" and "how often". They differ from specifier adverbs in the sense they introduce and can be associated to independent concepts;		*'''Adjunct adverbs''' (AAV) (such as “slowly”, “always”, “frequently”, “here”, etc) are adverbs that qualify a verb, an adjective or another adverb by indicating manner, time, place and frequency. They answer questions such as "how", "when", "where" and "how often". They differ from specifier adverbs in the sense they introduce and can be associated to independent concepts;
	*'''Conjuncts''' (CJT) <ref>Not to be confounded with conjunctions</ref> (such as "in addition", "in other words", "for instance", etc) are connecting adverbs that add information to the sentence that is not considered part of the propositional content (or at least not essential) but which connects the sentence with previous parts of the discourse; ~~Aand~~		*'''Conjuncts''' (CJT) <ref>Not to be confounded with conjunctions</ref> (such as "in addition", "in other words", "for instance", etc) are connecting adverbs that add information to the sentence that is not considered part of the propositional content (or at least not essential) but which connects the sentence with previous parts of the discourse; and
	*'''Disjuncts''' (DJT) (aka as adverbs of viewpoint or commenting adverbs, such as "fortunately", "in my opinion", etc) express information that is not considered essential to the sentence it appears in, but which is considered to be the speaker's or writer's attitude towards, or descriptive statement of, the propositional content of the sentence.		*'''Disjuncts''' (DJT) (aka as adverbs of viewpoint or commenting adverbs, such as "fortunately", "in my opinion", etc) express information that is not considered essential to the sentence it appears in, but which is considered to be the speaker's or writer's attitude towards, or descriptive statement of, the propositional content of the sentence.

imported>Martins at 11:46, 27 March 2010

2010-03-27T11:46:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:46, 27 March 2010
Line 4:		Line 4:

	In the UNL<sup>arium</sup> framework, '''adverbs''' are classified in four different categories: specifiers, adjuncts, conjuncts and disjuncts.		In the UNL<sup>arium</sup> framework, '''adverbs''' are classified in four different categories: specifiers, adjuncts, conjuncts and disjuncts.
	*'''Specifier adverbs''' (SAV) (such as “not”, “more”, “less”, “very”, etc) are adverbs that do not really introduce new information, but only specify the information conveyed by a verb, an adjective or another adverb. They do not constitute properly an open class category and many of them may ~~even~~ be replaced by other closed class categories, such as affixes (not happy = unhappy, write again = rewrite, more happy = happier);		*'''Specifier adverbs''' (SAV) (such as “not”, “more”, “less”, “very”, etc) are adverbs that do not really introduce new information, but only specify the information conveyed by a verb, an adjective or another adverb. They do not constitute properly an open class category and many of them may be replaced by other closed class categories, such as affixes (not happy = unhappy, write again = rewrite, more happy = happier);
	*'''Adjunct adverbs''' (AAV) (such as “slowly”, “always”, “frequently”, “here”, etc) are adverbs that qualify a verb, an adjective or another adverb by indicating manner, time, place and frequency. They answer questions such as "how", "when", "where" and "how often". They differ from specifier adverbs in the sense they introduce and can be associated to independent concepts;		*'''Adjunct adverbs''' (AAV) (such as “slowly”, “always”, “frequently”, “here”, etc) are adverbs that qualify a verb, an adjective or another adverb by indicating manner, time, place and frequency. They answer questions such as "how", "when", "where" and "how often". They differ from specifier adverbs in the sense they introduce and can be associated to independent concepts;
	*'''Conjuncts''' (CJT) <ref>Not to be confounded with conjunctions</ref> (such as "in addition", "in other words", "for instance", etc) are connecting adverbs that add information to the sentence that is not considered part of the propositional content (or at least not essential) but which connects the sentence with previous parts of the discourse; Aand		*'''Conjuncts''' (CJT) <ref>Not to be confounded with conjunctions</ref> (such as "in addition", "in other words", "for instance", etc) are connecting adverbs that add information to the sentence that is not considered part of the propositional content (or at least not essential) but which connects the sentence with previous parts of the discourse; Aand
	*'''Disjuncts''' (DJT) (aka as adverbs of viewpoint or commenting adverbs, such as "fortunately", "in my opinion", etc) express information that is not considered essential to the sentence it appears in, but which is considered to be the speaker's or writer's attitude towards, or descriptive statement of, the propositional content of the sentence.		*'''Disjuncts''' (DJT) (aka as adverbs of viewpoint or commenting adverbs, such as "fortunately", "in my opinion", etc) express information that is not considered essential to the sentence it appears in, but which is considered to be the speaker's or writer's attitude towards, or descriptive statement of, the propositional content of the sentence.

	== UNL ==		== UNL ==

imported>Martins at 10:20, 19 March 2010

2010-03-19T10:20:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:20, 19 March 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	In the UNL framework, '''adverbs''' are classified in four different categories: specifiers, adjuncts, conjuncts and disjuncts.		'''Adverbs''' are open-class [[LRU]]s that modify any part of the language other than a noun. Adverbs can modify verbs, adjectives (including numbers), clauses, sentences and other adverbs.
	*'''Specifier adverbs''' (such as “not”, “more”, “less”, “very”, etc) are adverbs that do not really introduce new information, but only specify the information conveyed by a verb, an adjective or another adverb. They do not constitute properly an open class category and many of them may even be replaced by other closed class categories, such as affixes (not happy = unhappy, write again = rewrite, more happy = happier). In UNL, ~~specifier~~ adverbs are represented by [[degree\|attributes of degree]] (@not, @more, @less, @plus, @minus, @almost, @again, etc);
			== Natural Language ==

			In the UNL<sup>arium</sup> framework, '''adverbs''' are classified in four different categories: specifiers, adjuncts, conjuncts and disjuncts.
			*'''Specifier adverbs''' (SAV) (such as “not”, “more”, “less”, “very”, etc) are adverbs that do not really introduce new information, but only specify the information conveyed by a verb, an adjective or another adverb. They do not constitute properly an open class category and many of them may even be replaced by other closed class categories, such as affixes (not happy = unhappy, write again = rewrite, more happy = happier);
			*'''Adjunct adverbs''' (AAV) (such as “slowly”, “always”, “frequently”, “here”, etc) are adverbs that qualify a verb, an adjective or another adverb by indicating manner, time, place and frequency. They answer questions such as "how", "when", "where" and "how often". They differ from specifier adverbs in the sense they introduce and can be associated to independent concepts;
			*'''Conjuncts''' (CJT) <ref>Not to be confounded with conjunctions</ref> (such as "in addition", "in other words", "for instance", etc) are connecting adverbs that add information to the sentence that is not considered part of the propositional content (or at least not essential) but which connects the sentence with previous parts of the discourse; Aand
			*'''Disjuncts''' (DJT) (aka as adverbs of viewpoint or commenting adverbs, such as "fortunately", "in my opinion", etc) express information that is not considered essential to the sentence it appears in, but which is considered to be the speaker's or writer's attitude towards, or descriptive statement of, the propositional content of the sentence.

			== UNL ==
			In UNL, adverbs are to be represented as UWs or attributes, depending on the case:
			*'''Specifier adverbs''' are represented by [[degree\|attributes of degree]] (@not, @more, @less, @plus, @minus, @almost, @again, etc);
	{\|table border=1 align=center cellpadding=2		{\|table border=1 align=center cellpadding=2
	\|+Specifier adverbs		\|+Specifier adverbs
Line 23:		Line 34:
	\|align=center\|intelligent.@plus		\|align=center\|intelligent.@plus
	\|}		\|}
			*'''Adjunct adverbs''' are always represented as UWs:

	*'''Adjunct adverbs''' (such as “slowly”, “always”, “frequently”, “here”, etc) are adverbs that qualify a verb, an adjective or another adverb by indicating manner, time, place and frequency. They answer questions such as "how", "when", "where" and "how often". They differ from specifier adverbs in the sense they introduce and can be associated to independent concepts. In UNL, adjunct adverbs are always represented as UWs:
	{\|table border=1 align=center cellpadding=2		{\|table border=1 align=center cellpadding=2
	\|+Adjunct adverbs		\|+Adjunct adverbs
Line 49:		Line 58:
	\|align=center\|man(do, usually)		\|align=center\|man(do, usually)
	\|}		\|}
			*'''Conjuncts''' are to be represented as UWs linked to the whole sentence (to be treated as a hypernode) by the relation man (manner).

	*'''Conjuncts'''<ref>Not to be confounded with conjunctions</ref> (such as "in addition", "in other words", "for instance", etc) are connecting adverbs that add information to the sentence that is not considered part of the propositional content (or at least not essential) but which connects the sentence with previous parts of the discourse. In UNL, conjunct adverbs are to be represented as UWs linked to the whole sentence (to be treated as a hypernode) by the relation man (manner).
	{\|table border=1 align=center cellpadding=2		{\|table border=1 align=center cellpadding=2
	\|+Conjuncts		\|+Conjuncts
Line 63:		Line 70:
	\|man("music is appreciated in France", "in other words")		\|man("music is appreciated in France", "in other words")
	\|}		\|}
			*'''Disjuncts''' are to be represented as follows:

	*'''Disjuncts''' (aka as adverbs of viewpoint or commenting adverbs, such as "fortunately", "in my opinion", etc) express information that is not considered essential to the sentence it appears in, but which is considered to be the speaker's or writer's attitude towards, or descriptive statement of, the propositional content of the sentence. In UNL, disjunct adverbs are to be represented as follows:
	**As attributes, if their meaning can be subsumed by any of the [[modality\|attributes of modality]] (such as @emphasis, @belief, @conviction, etc); or		**As attributes, if their meaning can be subsumed by any of the [[modality\|attributes of modality]] (such as @emphasis, @belief, @conviction, etc); or
	**As UWs, otherwise.		**As UWs, otherwise.

imported>Admin at 10:16, 22 February 2010

2010-02-22T10:16:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:16, 22 February 2010
Line 21:		Line 21:
	!Intensifier		!Intensifier
	\|align=center\|very intelligent		\|align=center\|very intelligent
	\|align=center\|intelligent.@~~very~~		\|align=center\|intelligent.@plus
	\|}		\|}

imported>Admin at 12:07, 21 February 2010

2010-02-21T12:07:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:07, 21 February 2010
Line 10:		Line 10:
	\|align=center\|not intelligent		\|align=center\|not intelligent
	\|align=center\|intelligent.@not		\|align=center\|intelligent.@not
			\|-
			!Approximative
			\|align=center\|almost intelligent
			\|align=center\|intelligent.@almost
	\|-		\|-
	!Comparative		!Comparative

imported>Admin at 12:02, 21 February 2010

2010-02-21T12:02:44Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:02, 21 February 2010
Line 15:		Line 15:
	\|align=center\|intelligent.@more		\|align=center\|intelligent.@more
	\|-		\|-
	!Intensifier~~<ref id=intensifier />~~		!Intensifier
	\|align=center\|very intelligent		\|align=center\|very intelligent
	\|align=center\|intelligent.@very		\|align=center\|intelligent.@very