Aspect: Difference between revisions
From UNLwiki
				
				
				Jump to navigationJump to search
				
				
imported>Admin No edit summary  | 
				imported>Admin No edit summary  | 
				||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
== Natural language ==    | == Natural language ==    | ||
In the UNLarium,   | In the UNLarium, aspect may assume the following values:  | ||
{{#tree:id=nl_tense|openlevels=0|root=Aspect (ASP)|  | {{#tree:id=nl_tense|openlevels=0|root=Aspect (ASP)|  | ||
*perfective (PFV): completed  | *perfective (PFV): completed  | ||
*imperfective (  | *imperfective (NPFV): uncompleted  | ||
**continuative (CTN): continuous  | **continuative (CTN): continuous  | ||
***progressive (PGS): ongoing  | ***progressive (PGS): ongoing  | ||
*perfect (PFC):   | **habitual (HAB): habitual  | ||
**experiential perfect aspect (EXP):   | **iterative (ITE): repetition  | ||
**perfect of persistent situation (PSS):   | *perfect (PFC): relevant to the present  | ||
**perfect of recent past (PRP): proximity   | **experiential perfect aspect (EXP): relevant because of the experience  | ||
**perfect of result (RES):   | **perfect of persistent situation (PSS): relevant because of the persistence  | ||
**perfect of recent past (PRP): relevant because of the proximity    | |||
**perfect of result (RES): relevant because of the result  | |||
*prospective (PPT): imminent  | *prospective (PPT): imminent  | ||
*inceptive (ICP): beginning  | *inceptive (ICP): beginning  | ||
*terminative (TER): cessation  | *terminative (TER): cessation  | ||
}}  | }}  | ||
;Perfect and perfective are different aspectual values:  | ;Perfect and perfective are different aspectual values:  | ||
:perfective = seen as completed  (He ate the apple)  | :perfective = seen as completed  (He ate the apple)  | ||
:perfect = seen as relevant   | :perfect = seen as relevant to the present (He has eaten the apple)  | ||
;Aspect values may be combined through "&":  | ;Aspect values may be combined through "&":  | ||
| Line 35: | Line 33: | ||
=== Examples ===  | === Examples ===  | ||
*perfective (PFV): He ate an apple  | |||
*  | *progressive (PGS): He is eating an apple  | ||
*  | *habitual (HAB): He eats apples.   | ||
*iterative (ITE): He has been eating apples for years  | |||
*experiential perfect aspect (EXP): He has never eaten an apple  | |||
*perfect of persistent situation (PSS): He has been eating that apple since yesterday  | |||
*perfect of recent past (PRP): He has just eaten the apple  | |||
*perfect of result (RES): He has eaten the apple  | |||
*prospective (PPT): He is about to eat the applet  | |||
*inceptive (ICP): He starts to eat the apple  | |||
*terminative (TER): He finishes to eat the apple  | |||
== UNL ==  | == UNL ==  | ||
Revision as of 10:45, 16 January 2010
Aspect is a category used to indicate the temporal internal structure of an event.
Natural language
In the UNLarium, aspect may assume the following values:
{{#tree:id=nl_tense|openlevels=0|root=Aspect (ASP)|
- perfective (PFV): completed
 - imperfective (NPFV): uncompleted
- continuative (CTN): continuous
- progressive (PGS): ongoing
 
 - habitual (HAB): habitual
 - iterative (ITE): repetition
 
 - continuative (CTN): continuous
 - perfect (PFC): relevant to the present
- experiential perfect aspect (EXP): relevant because of the experience
 - perfect of persistent situation (PSS): relevant because of the persistence
 - perfect of recent past (PRP): relevant because of the proximity
 - perfect of result (RES): relevant because of the result
 
 - prospective (PPT): imminent
 - inceptive (ICP): beginning
 - terminative (TER): cessation
 
}}
- Perfect and perfective are different aspectual values
 - perfective = seen as completed (He ate the apple)
 - perfect = seen as relevant to the present (He has eaten the apple)
 
- Aspect values may be combined through "&"
 - I am eating = progressive (PGS)
 - I have eaten = perfect of persistent situation (PSS)
 - I have been eating = PGS&PSS
 
Examples
- perfective (PFV): He ate an apple
 - progressive (PGS): He is eating an apple
 - habitual (HAB): He eats apples.
 - iterative (ITE): He has been eating apples for years
 - experiential perfect aspect (EXP): He has never eaten an apple
 - perfect of persistent situation (PSS): He has been eating that apple since yesterday
 - perfect of recent past (PRP): He has just eaten the apple
 - perfect of result (RES): He has eaten the apple
 - prospective (PPT): He is about to eat the applet
 - inceptive (ICP): He starts to eat the apple
 - terminative (TER): He finishes to eat the apple
 
UNL
In UNL, aspect is to be represented by attributes indicating the temporal internal structure of the event.
{{#tree:id=unl_aspect|openlevels=0|root=Aspect|
- @continuative: continuous
 - @experiential: experience
 - @habitual: habitual
 - @imperfective: uncompleted
 - @inceptive: beginning
 - @iterative: repetition
 - @perfective: completed
 - @progressive: ongoing
 - @prospective: imminent
 - @terminative: cessation
 
}}
- Aspect values may be combined.
 - I start to eat = eat.@inceptive
 - I'm starting to eat = eat.@inceptive.@progressive
 
Examples
- @continuative: I'm still eating the apple.
 - @experiential: I have already eaten an apple
 - @habitual: I eat apples.
 - @imperfective: I was eating the apple (when she came).
 - @inceptive: I start eating the apple.
 - @iterative: I ate and ate the apple.
 - @perfective: I ate the apple.
 - @progressive: I'm eating the apple.
 - @prospective: I'm about to eat the apple.
 - @terminative: I finished eating the apple.
 
List of verb forms: